“Here is your country. Cherish these natural wonders, cherish the natural resources, cherish the history and romance as a sacred heritage, for your children and your children’s children. Do not let selfish men, or greedy interests, skin your country of its beauty, its riches or its romance.”
Theodore Roosevelt

Sunday, January 5, 2014

Dr. Pierce research on impact of sand mining on quality of air we breathe

Dear Friends and Neighbors,
  News for our region: Dr. Pierce research on impact of sand mining on quality of air we breathe;
                                   Aerial Fracking Photo projects
                                   7,300-mile ring of mercury around Alberta Tar Sands
                                  
Frac Sand Summit
Winona, January 18, 2014
 "Landslide" slide show
Wishing you well,
Bonita


On Sunday, January 5, 2014 10:01 PM, Patricia J. Popple <sunnyday5@charter.net> wrote:

HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL OF YOU!
I hope you have had the opportunity to take some time away from the issues of silica mining although I know many of you have spent many spare moments working on a variety of topics and trying to find ways to combat the invasion into our cities, towns, and counties here in Wisconsin as well as Minnesota, Iowa, Illinois, Michigan and other states also.
WE BEGIN A NEW YEAR WITH REFRESHED HOPE AND A NEW LOOK AT THE ISSUES!
WORKING TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE!

JOIN TOGETHER THROUGHOUT THE REGION TO ASSIST EACH OTHER, TO LEARN MORE ABOUT WHAT IS HAPPENING AND TO BEGIN RESISTANCE TO THE MANY INTRUSIONS THIS INDUSTRY IS BRINGING INTO THE MIDWEST AS WELL AS TO OUR LOCAL NEIGHBORHOODS. TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE.

You will find two files of the Frac Sand Sentinel in the attachments. One is in PDF; the other is in Word. Choose the one that is best for you. Feel free to share the newsletters with others in your groups.

There are several important pieces in this newsletter:
1. please donate funds for equipment purposes (there are at least 2 needs) Even small donations will make a difference. Most certainly Dr. Pierce needs the equipment to measure PM 2.5's in the air..........for the health and welfare of all! If no one else will fund this project, then it is up to citizens to do so!
2. learn about the Landsman's Handbook! How revealing although many have been already exposed to the strategies of the mining companies.
3. attend the SUMMIT in Winona-details inside
4. look for other resources that can help you learn more about this very complicated industry and the impact it is having on us all
Pat Popple
715-723-6398
sunnyday5@charter.net   Feel free to contribute ideas, information, suggestions. If you have questions please ask! I am more than happy to assist!!

Wednesday, December 4, 2013

"Oversight" has a flexible definition.

Quote of the day . . .
Sheriff James Kowalczyk said there were no records of the Saturday derailment and that's because not every accident is required to be reported.
“These two incidents apparently did not cause any damage to the roadway, there was no spillage and in reality there was really no need for law enforcement to respond to these two derailments that occurred here with in the last couple of weeks,” said Kowalczyk.


-- 
Please donate to our cause - send donations to STHA, Inc., c/o Ken Lestrud, Treasurer, N7225 690th Street, Menomonie,WI 54751
STHA, Inc., 12568 44th Ave., Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 - (877) 353-4976
501(c)(3) tax deductible status - wisair.wordpress.com
Visit us on Facebook!

Shift in interest to St. Peter formation for frac sand mining west of Miss. R.

From: Ric Zarwell ric.zarwell@mchsi.com
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 5:29 PM.

Dear Colleagues in opposing frac sand mining:
I have learned from a very good source in Wisconsin (who I trust 100%, and who rightly wishes to remain anonymous) the following insights:

These are that WI person's words:
I have learned  that EOG (Enron Oil & Gas) who are thought of as an industry leader in Fracking of tight shale oil deposits, is looking for 100 mesh sand and is starting to mine and process the Tunnel City Formation (which previously everyone thought was worthless) because they have gotten better results using fine sand rather then the coarser grades in their wells.  EOG believes the industry will eventually follow their lead within the next couple of years.  This could change the locations within the Driftless Area that the industry targets to mine Frac sand.  Please include this tidbit of information in your planning, in your newsletters, etc. 

So after receiving the above information, today I discussed grain sizes of silica sand with the Iowa state geologist.  His impression is the same as mine, that our deeper Jordan sandstone formation has larger grain sizes than the higher St. Peter formation.  The Iowa state geologist then followed-up with the email and link shown below that clearly verifies that St. Peter would be targeted more vigorously if finer sand grains were being sought as per the new information from Wisconsin.  All must realize that the higher level St. Peter is much more vulnerable to mining than the deeper Jordan!!!

Ric,
 Here is a guidebook from a frac sand workshop held a year ago, concurrent with a groundwater meeting I was attending.  You might find the whole thing of interest.  Regarding sand sizes from the Upper  Midwest  sandstones, see the section on about pages 13-14 that deals with sand grain characteristics.    http://www.d.umn.edu/prc/workshops/Guidebooks/Silica%20Sand%20Field%20TripC.pdf

I believe the information provided at the above link is from the perspective of state government / academics / industry, and that it is probably aimed at encouraging industry.  The warning signals are right there in our faces!!!  
The upshot is that the maps, graphs and text at this link downplay mining opportunities in Iowa and Minnesota for the fine grained St. Peter - in favor of what was thought to be the targeted: Jordan sandstone.  That appears to be changing, and west of the Mississippi we may be targeted more than ever for FSM.
As our colleagues, I want to provide you with what could very well be a shift in priorities for the frac sand mining industry.  Iowa and Minnesota have a huge amount of St. Peter formation at or near the landscape surface; and this formation will be much EASIER and LESS EXPENSIVE to mine than the Jordan formation that we have been led to believe was the priority sand.  Bottom-line, all of us on the west side of the Mississippi ought to be even more concerned than we already are.

Additional background info. . . . . . There is Pattison's mine in Clayton Co. Iowa, located in the next county south of Allamakee.  This is the only operating FSM in Iowa, due to being grandfathered in because it was in operation decades ago for earlier purposes such as producing sand to manufacture glass.  We know that Pattison is mining St. Peter sandstone for fracking, and it is a large and rapidly expanding operation.  According to their website < http://www.pattisonsand.com/html/products.html >  Pattison offers silica sand in these mesh sizes:  20-40; 30-50; 40-70; and 60-140.  The majority of what they have been offering has grain sizes larger than 100 mesh (20-100).  And they offer less of the smaller particles (100-140).  (The larger the number the smaller the particle size.)  

It would really be helpful to know how much sand is being sold in each of these grain size ranges.  This would allow us to prepare more effectively for any new permits for mining.  Recall that it is the finer sized silica sand particles that are carcinogenic and that cause silicosis (lung cancer). 
Let's stay on top of this apparent shift in mining priorities.  The higher level St. Peter is much more vulnerable to mining than the deeper Jordan.  I am extremely concerned that the apparent shift in priorities for miners will make the west side of the Mississippi River much more vulnerable.

Thank you.


Ric 
Ric Zarwell, President
Allamakee County Protectors - Education Campaign
P.O. Box 299
210 North Third Street
Lansing, Iowa 52151-0299
Home/Office: 563-538-4991
Mobile: 563-419-4991 
The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, 
but because of the people who don't do anything about it.   Albert Einstein

Tuesday, December 3, 2013

guidebook from a frac sand workshop held a year ago

Ric,
 Here is a guidebook from a frac sand workshop held a year ago, concurrent with a groundwater meeting I was attending.  You might find the whole thing of interest.  Regarding sand sizes from the Upper  Midwest  sandstones, see the section on about pages 13-14 that deals with sand grain characteristics.    http://www.d.umn.edu/prc/workshops/Guidebooks/Silica%20Sand%20Field%20TripC.pdf

I believe the information provided at the above link is from the perspective of state government / academics / industry, and that it is probably aimed at encouraging industry.  The warning signals are right there in our faces!!!  
The upshot is that the maps, graphs and text at this link downplay mining opportunities in Iowa and Minnesota for the fine grained St. Peter - in favor of what was thought to be the targeted: Jordan sandstone.  That appears to be changing, and west of the Mississippi we may be targeted more than ever for FSM.
As our colleagues, I want to provide you with what could very well be a shift in priorities for the frac sand mining industry.  Iowa and Minnesota have a huge amount of St. Peter formation at or near the landscape surface; and this formation will be much EASIER and LESS EXPENSIVE to mine than the Jordan formation that we have been led to believe was the priority sand.  Bottom-line, all of us on the west side of the Mississippi ought to be even more concerned than we already are.

Additional background info. . . . . . There is Pattison's mine in Clayton Co. Iowa, located in the next county south of Allamakee.  This is the only operating FSM in Iowa, due to being grandfathered in because it was in operation decades ago for earlier purposes such as producing sand to manufacture glass.  We know that Pattison is mining St. Peter sandstone for fracking, and it is a large and rapidly expanding operation.  According to their website < http://www.pattisonsand.com/html/products.html >  Pattison offers silica sand in these mesh sizes:  20-40; 30-50; 40-70; and 60-140.  The majority of what they have been offering has grain sizes larger than 100 mesh (20-100).  And they offer less of the smaller particles (100-140).  (The larger the number the smaller the particle size.)  

It would really be helpful to know how much sand is being sold in each of these grain size ranges.  This would allow us to prepare more effectively for any new permits for mining.  Recall that it is the finer sized silica sand particles that are carcinogenic and that cause silicosis (lung cancer). 
 
Let's stay on top of this apparent shift in mining priorities.  The higher level St. Peter is much more vulnerable to mining than the deeper Jordan.  I am extremely concerned that the apparent shift in priorities for miners will make the west side of the Mississippi River much more vulnerable.

Thank you.


Ric 
Ric Zarwell, President
Allamakee County Protectors - Education Campaign
P.O. Box 299
210 North Third Street
Lansing, Iowa 52151-0299
Home/Office: 563-538-4991
Mobile: 563-419-4991 
The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, 
but because of the people who don't do anything about it.   Albert Einstein
 

Wednesday, November 20, 2013

 In case you were not in Eau Claire....information without the travel.
Wishing you well,
Bonita


The video Forum/Panel sponsored by the Penokee Hills Project and titled: Dangers Unseen: Blasting Ultra-Fine Particles and Human Health is now posted on YouTube at the following address:

 The session was WELL attended, there was a great deal of interest and the questions were outstanding. Dr. Crispin Pierce and his students and Dr. Michael McCauley shared a great deal of information. Bob Kincaid, a well known broadcaster, moderated the panel. This event applied to those living in the Appalachians living in W. VA. as well as to Wisconsin folks surrounded the the frac sand industry and hilltop removal strategies.
Please share with people everywhere! Feel free to post on websites, facebook pages and wherever people might benefit by viewing the production.
Thanks to Liz for her work in videotaping, posting it on YouTube and helping to get out these messages to people around the nation!

Tuesday, November 12, 2013

Please join us for the Silica Sand Mining Update tomorrow

Dear Friends and Neighbors,
  Carpooling can make this easier and more pleasant.  Should you wish to share trip from Lanesboro area, please phone me tonight until 9:30 or tomorrow by noon. 507-467-2157.
Wishing you well,
Bonita
 

 
Please try to attend.  MPR is misreporting about this issue, claiming that mining within 1 miles of trout was banned by the legislature.  Senator Schmit did try to get that in law, but the pro-mining folks defeated it.  Under the compromise that passed, mining is allowed with a permit from the DNR
People working to make sure frac sand is adequately regulated tell me that the industry most likely wants people think that any additional measures are overly burdensome.  Review coverage from last April and May.  Thanks.


Please join us for the Silica Sand Mining Update tomorrow (Wed Nov 13) at 7:00pm at the Heintz Center in Rochester


SILICA SAND MINING UPDATE for SE MINNESOTA
with Sen Matt Schmit (DFL-RedWing)

Come hear the latest in the silica sand debate with SE Minnesota’s champion on the issue.

Wednesday, November 13, 2013
7:00 p.m.
Location: Heintz Center Commons
1926 Collegeview Rd SE, Rochester

Open to the Public
Sponsored by SD 26 DFL and Olmsted 25 DFL
Light refreshments will be served.

Friday, November 8, 2013

new scientific research project financially sponsored by the Wisconsin Farmer's Union

 Dear Readers of the Frac Sand Sentinel.

I am pleased to announce a new scientific research project financially sponsored by the Wisconsin Farmer's Union.  A tremendous volume of preliminary research work has been done by Dr. Ron Koshoshek, Professor Emeritus,  University of Wisconsin, Eau Claire, in order to transform his findings into an action research project that could impact the health conditions of current and future generations to come.

I urge you to consider a gift to the Wisconsin Farmer's Union so as to develop and sustain this project.

Thank you much for your concern, your continuing efforts, and your diligent work in keeping your communities and rural areas healthy and safe from harm.  I urge you to spread this message to the members of your groups and friends, family and neighbors throughout your region via email, face book pages and websites!
Sincerely,
Pat Popple

A MESSAGE FROM RON KOSHOSHEK:
Greetings:
 
         I have attached the announcement of a partnership scientific research program for sampling indoor air quality near mining facilities in willing homes, businesses and other places where humans gather such as schools, hospitals, clinics and daycare facilities. The equipment used is approved by both OSHA and WOHL. WOHL’s analysis will measure the concentration of respirable crystalline silica PM 2.5 in the samples collected rather than just measuring the volume of dust. It is a sampling program, not a monitoring program.  It has a scientific, not a regulatory purpose.  Since respirable crystalline silica has not been added to the list of air pollutants, there is no standard for respirable crystalline silica.  Thus, in the absence of a standard, regulation by any public agency in Wisconsin, including DNR, is legally impossible.
 
        The partners in the program include the non-profit foundation of the Wisconsin Farmer’s Union, the County Health departments who choose to join the program and conduct the research, Dr. Tom Peters and his research group at the University of Iowa, and the Wisconsin Occupational Health Lab. The WOHL will analyze the samples for the concentration of quartz PM 2.5.  The program can also be expanded to interested communities in Minnesota and Iowa, although its initial implementation is here in Wisconsin.
 
        As you know so well, there is a major effort in the legislature to prevent the gathering of scientific information about air quality impacts of the frac sand industry.  The four “top tier” companies that make up WISA (Wisconsin Industrial Sand Association) have been instrumental in drafting the legislation abolishing local control as well as any monitoring by local governments.  Despite this group’s repeatedly expressed desire for policy based on science rather than speculation and scare-tactics, they support the abolition of scientific investigations regarding air quality.
 
        I suspect that the county health departments may need some help and support in counties with county boards that oppose science based knowledge of air quality impacts.  Please send this announcement out on your list serves, websites, and face book pages! Will keep you informed regarding future developments.
 
Ron Koshoshek
Professor Emeritus, UWEC
 

Community Partnership for Indoor Air Sampling
 
A project to establish a partnership for indoor-air sampling between county Public Health Departments, medical and scientific professionals and the WI Farmers Union Foundation
 
                There is a widespread concern among citizens and officials in our rural communities (including our Farmers Union members), as well as professionals within the medical and scientific community about the lack of monitoring for the level of respirable crystalline silica (RSC) in close proximity to frac-sand mining operations, including near mine sites themselves, processing and trans-loading facilities, and along the routes on which frac sand is frequently transported.   
 
                We realize there are financial and legal obstacles faced by government at any level to monitor for RSC in the ambient air near mining operations, even if they wish to do so.  However, the outside air does enter into the homes and businesses located near these operations.   A program of sampling indoor air is not faced with these obstacles and can be conducted by health care professionals who are already in place in the Public Health Departments of county governments, and already experienced in sampling indoor air quality for a variety of pollutants.  
 
                The non-profit Foundation of the Wisconsin Farmers Union is proposing to coordinate a partnership with county Public Health Departments to establish a program of sampling indoor air quality for the concentration of respirable crystalline silica in the homes, businesses and other buildings of willing owners at sites located near frac sand mining operations.   The Foundation’s role in this partnership will focus on two elements: (1) providing local health departments with the use of very high quality sampling equipment free of charge, and (2) coordinating the sharing of data from county sampling efforts for review and analysis by a nationally recognized scientific investigator.    
 
                The County Health Departments will have control of the on-the-ground aspects of the program, including choosing the sites it will sample, and the operational process for placing instruments and gathering samples. Information on sites and participants will be retained confidentially within the county. All collected samples will be independently tested by the WI Occupational Health Lab. Counties will be responsible for costs associated with sampling and WOHL testing of  the results.
 
                Because of the serious interest in studying health impacts shown by your county moratorium, we are here this evening to offer your county  the opportunity to be an initial participant in a trial run of this program.  We hope offer the same opportunity to several other county health departments at their November regional meeting.  If your use of the samplers shows promise, we intend to expand the program to other interested counties as well.
 
                After much consultation with leading experts, we have discovered that the equipment needed for a study such as this is far more sophisticated and much more expensive than the personal air samplers commonly used for OSHA sampling of indoor air quality. The WFU foundation has agreed to provide funding to purchase the initial equipment for the project and to provide this equipment free of charge to selected county health departments for their use in the trial period. If successful in providing useful data, we will solicit additional funds to expand the program. Project funding will consist of donations to our non-profit Foundation, and will come from our members and other local sources in Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Iowa, including  members of the medical, scientific and business communities. Our goal is provide a scientifically valid study at a cost that is affordable to local governments and which can be managed by existing professional staff.
 
                In order to provide a scientifically valid framework and analysis for the project, the Foundation will be partnering with Dr. Tom Peters, PHD, MS, CIH.   Dr. Peters is an Associate Professor in the University of Iowa’s Dept of Occupational and Environmental Health and is a certified environmental engineer and a national leader in air quality research.  He also leads a team of scientists including toxicologists that make up the University of Iowa Laboratory Research Group.    
 
                Dr. Peters has agreed to provide continuing counsel to the Foundation and participating counties regarding any special issues that may arise in the project.  In exchange for his expertise, the Foundation has agreed to provide Dr. Peters with the results of the WOHL’s lab analysis of each sample.   Dr. Peters will evaluate the significance of the numerical data and use the data for his own research and publication purposes. The Foundation understands that the numerical data are open to the public,but that the location of the sampled site and its owner are confidential matters that must be shielded from public view both by the Foundation and the County.
 
                The Foundation also wants to express its appreciation for the advice and counsel of  Stephen Klafka, a board certified environmental engineer and President of Wingra Engineering in Madison WI, who has contributed greatly to the selection of the appropriate sampling equipment and to understanding the various issues associated with both ambient and indoor air sampling.    Mike Cavanaugh, Director of Consultation at WOHL, has also been instrumental in setting the stage for cooperation with WOHL over the entire course of this program.
 
Tom Quinn      
Executive Director
Wisconsin Farmers Union
 
Ron Koshoshek
Professor Emeritus, UWEC