From: Sen.Tiffany
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 3:55 PM
To: *Legislative All Senate; *Legislative All Assembly
Subject: Co-sponsorship of LRB-3146/1 and LRB-3408/1 Relating to: Regulatory Certainty Act
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 3:55 PM
To: *Legislative All Senate; *Legislative All Assembly
Subject: Co-sponsorship of LRB-3146/1 and LRB-3408/1 Relating to: Regulatory Certainty Act
TO:
Legislative Colleagues
FROM:
Senator Tom Tiffany and
Representative Joan Ballweg
DATE:
October 16, 2013
RE:
Co-sponsorship of LRB 3146/1 & LRB 3408/1 relating to Local Regulation of
Nonmetallic Mining
SHORT DEADLINE: Monday, October 21st at
Noon.
In
February of 2012, the Wisconsin Supreme Court issued a decision that
substantially expanded the authority of local governments to regulate land use
under the guise of its police powers, rather than through the zoning
process. This expanded use of police powers enables local governments to
duplicate, ignore or otherwise evade long-standing zoning requirements and
procedures associated with the siting and operation of non-metallic mining
sites. As a result, the industry is increasingly becoming subjected to a
patchwork of local zoning and police power ordinances that may involve multiple
layers of local government. The court’s decision undermines local zoning
and creates regulatory and operational uncertainty for the non-metallic mining
industry in Wisconsin.
This
legislation does three things:
- Legislatively
reaffirms that local land use restrictions on non-metallic mining, as
defined by Wis. Stat. §295.11 (3), may only be accomplished through the
zoning authority of the county, town, village, or city. Granting
local governments the power to discriminatorily restrict or prevent
non-metallic mining under its police power rather than through zoning
creates an arbitrary and uncertain regulatory climate for the non-metallic
mining industry. It discourages future investment and threatens
existing operations.
- Legislatively
reaffirms the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR) as the
state’s sole environmental regulator by specifically preempting local
governments from enacting or enforcing standards related to air or water
quality. The DNR has historically served as the state’s
environmental regulator, and the Legislature has charged the agency with
the responsibility of establishing air and water quality standards to
protect public health. Having a patchwork quilt of environmental standards
scattered across the state will create confusion and inconsistency for the
regulated community, which in turn will result in a barrier to
investment. The environmental “rules of the game” should not change
from community to community.
- Establishes state
standards that provide for reasonable parameters under which financial
assurance to protect against local road damage may be imposed by local
government. Such parameters would make clear that local government
may not impose front end taxes for the privilege of operating on public
roads, but may require that financial assurance be posted to cover actual
road damages caused by any particular road user. The non-metallic
mining industry will continue to pay its fair share for road use.
Like any other bulk material enterprise, this industry relies on good
roads and transportation infrastructure to move product to processing and
market.
This
legislation does not:
- Prevent a zoning
jurisdiction from prohibiting non-metallic mining.
- Lessen the
stringent regulatory standards on siting and operating a non-metallic
mine.
If you
would like to be added as a co-sponsor of this legislation, please contact
Senator Tiffany’s Office at 6-2509 or Representative Ballweg’s Office at 6-8077
by Monday, October 21stat
Noon. You will automatically be added onto the companion
legislation unless otherwise noted.
No comments:
Post a Comment